The good tidings of the holidays and beginning of 2019 new year bring with it fervent hopes for things to improve, get better and this: for switches in trustees.
Concern #1 points out the obvious but as of now, nebulous, unclear and largely unfulfilled role of responsibility for successor trustee assurance. Concern #2 raises the question, who is qualified and can expertly assist a potential successor trustee understand any and all potential risks and or potential claims deep in the weeds of the previous trustees’, board of directors’, board of trustees’ and or investment committee’s acts or omissions? Concern #3 a nearly inseparable risk which can infect advice and bias guidance from local and or long-time trusted advisors. Why? There may be potential principal-agent conflicts of interest such as self – dealing and or prioritizing certain third parties’ agendas over a new trustee’s interests, which can and often impinges your advisors’ duty of loyalty (behind your back, without your knowledge, consent and or authorization) which should be undivided, meaning your advisors owe and should extend that duty of loyalty to you as a potential successor trustee and only to you and you should have that understanding clear, unambiguous and in writing.
However, it’s harder to imagine a more potentially fraught-filled and risky role than a trustee; except for those invited or asked to take over as a successor trustee which is a potential hornet’s nest.
Throughout my 35 years of experience, what’s always helped me most was the ability to stay informed and top of issues from both near and afar. Being able to lend my expertise and a fresh set of eyes from afar has proved helpful in countless situations and helped many clients avoid what was unseen and or misunderstood by advisers being a little too close to the action, in other words, not able to see the forest for the trees and or on occasion outright conflicted and biased.
While trustees of any stripe are fiduciaries and personally responsible for a wide variety and increasingly microscopically forensically scrutinized potential breaches of trust, duty, conflicts of interest and or self – dealing plus the acts or omissions of others. Successor trustees are in a bit of a situation not unlike squirrels on a wheel. Why? Continuing the squirrel theme, in a nutshell, in addition to being on the hook for 1) their own acts or omissions 2) they are also on a time-sensitive duty to look under the hood and into the prior trustee’s acts and or omissions and take appropriate, timely remedial actions including pursuing any and all potential claims against the prior trustee(s) AND or third parties. A few obvious pitfalls are failing: 1) to look, 2) to bring a claim timely or 3) not filing timely tax or information returns.
It’s strongly suggested potential Successor trustees review any and all trust-related documents, ask pertinent questions and receive answers in writing from current trustee(s) if available before formally accepting the position of successor trustee. The days of simply signing up after the prior trustee signs off is almost a sure recipe for disaster for the successor trustee, especially first-time or relatively inexperienced lay (non-professional) trustees, no matter exculpatory language (which often states new trustees are not responsible and or do not need to investigate the acts or omissions of the previous trustee(s)) which may be in the authorizing instruments such as a trust or organization by-laws or mission.)
We recently posted a suggestion for Brokerage and Trust accounts to consider budgeting for commissions, fee and expenses so as to guide, plan for and control same. For new or potential successor trustees budgets for the above as well as budgets for any and all potential line items of cash inflows and outflows may help better understand, monitor and control and attend to any and all fiduciary duties.
A recent headline-grabbing money laundering case from the UK highlights so-called “professional enablers” in this excerpt:
Hajiyev’s fortune — believed by law enforcement officials to have once exceeded $100 million — has become the focus of a groundbreaking money-laundering case. The U.K.’s National Crime Agency obtained court orders in 2018 freezing some of his assets and requiring Zamira to explain the origins of the family’s wealth. The authorities have said they hope the case will be a blueprint for curbing the estimated 100 billion pounds ($128 billion) in dirty money that worms its way into Britain every year, often from economically deprived countries.One of the keys to doing that is cracking down on so-called professional enablers, who are required under U.K. regulations to carry out know-your-customer checks of clients and report suspicious activity to the authorities. A politically connected chairman of a state-owned bank in a notoriously corrupt country, whose spending far outstripped his earnings, should have raised red flags with those hired to manage his finances. One look at the International Bank of Azerbaijan’s annual reports and prospectuses would have shown that compensation for its five-member management board, plus senior executives, totaled about $1 million a year during Hajiyev’s tenure in the 2010s. In 2018, a British judge said it was “very unlikely” that Hajiyev “would have generated sufficient income” to fund even one of his many properties.
PROPHYLACTIC ASSURANCE SERVICE FOR SUCCESSOR TRUSTEES
We help you and your legal counsel answer and get comfortable – not guess, suppose or assume – with the most important questions such as: what do I and should I really know about this trust, non-profit, charity, foundation or endowment that I should know before I agree to become a trustee or successor trustee? Absence of an evidenced-based comfort level points to declining the invitation to become a trustee and avoiding potential headaches down the road. The same set of prophylactic assurance services are available and apply to new CEO’s, C-level or senior level officers. Be headache – free and contact us to get started.
For Professional Athletes:
Have you, a teammate, coach, friend or colleague had a close call with a slick, you might say less-than-upfront operator(s) trying to ride your brand name or get you involved in an investment “ground floor opportunity or great deal” or serve / use your name as a charity supporter or even serve as a trustee or perhaps you may even serve in a trustee or fiduciary duty – exposed role?
We treat all inquiries, referrals and engagements with the utmost, strict confidentiality. As for us being on social media, we are not, we know the limits of our time which allows no time for social media, we haven’t built our business in that fashion, we don’t and never have been active on social media. While many of our clients are active on it, for now, we prefer to avoid it. Among other things, that explains why this site does not have any social media links.
We are uniquely positioned having seen many hundreds of pitfalls in over 35 years of professional experience, prior to that as well during our college years to help expediently assist potential and or already committed new Successor trustees and legal counsel conduct such a review with a prophylactic Fiduciary Forensic Audit and or FACE Audit™ among other forensic tracing-related needs which may arise in the course of the audit or investigation.
For more information see Fiduciary Expert, Chris McConnell, AIFA® About and you can reach us at:
info@mcfideo.com or (310) 943 – 6509
Copyright Chris McConnell & Associates 2004 to 2020 All rights reserved
All inquiries, referrals and engagements are held strictly confidential